Response to MIT/Caltech
The MIT/CalTech study suggests that the difference between the exit polls and the vote tally can be explained
by volatility of the exit polls early in the day and that the accuracy of the final exit poll with the complete sample
is the one to be trusted.
Below are three tables of data from exit polls displayed on CNN’s website on Nov 2 and early morning Nov 3.
As you can see the swings from late night to early morning are dramatic and can not be explained by the indicated
increase in the sample size. In other words, the changes in the poll can not be attributed to more accuracy due a
more complete sample as the MIT/CalTech study suggests.
I believe that the changes below can only be made by manipulation of the database, either by moving data around
or by changing the weightings used throughout the day. The former is fraudulent, the later could have an explanation
but to my knowledge none has been offered. This indicates a fraudulent manipulation of the final exit poll update, but
is not conclusive.
|
Ohio CNN exit poll data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Proportion |
Bush |
Kerry |
|
|||||
|
Time |
Respondents |
Male% |
Female% |
Male% |
Female% |
Total |
Male% |
Female% |
Total |
Margin |
|
|
|
47.0% |
53.0% |
49.0% |
47.0% |
47.9% |
51.0% |
53.0% |
52.1% |
-4.1% |
|
|
1963 |
923 |
1040 |
452 |
489 |
941 |
471 |
551 |
1022 |
-81 |
|
|
|
47.0% |
53.0% |
52.0% |
50.0% |
50.9% |
47.0% |
50.0% |
48.6% |
2.4% |
|
|
2020 |
949 |
1071 |
494 |
535 |
1029 |
446 |
535 |
982 |
47 |
|
1
hour 20 min |
57 |
|
|
42 |
46 |
88 |
-24 |
-16 |
-40 |
|
|
National CNN exit poll data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion |
Bush |
Kerry |
|
|||||
|
Time |
Respondents |
Male% |
Female% |
Male% |
Female% |
Total |
Male% |
Female% |
Total |
Margin |
|
|
|
46.0% |
54.0% |
51.0% |
45.0% |
47.8% |
47.0% |
54.0% |
50.8% |
-3.0% |
|
|
13000 |
5980 |
7020 |
3050 |
3159 |
6209 |
2811 |
3791 |
6601 |
-393 |
|
|
|
46.0% |
54.0% |
52.0% |
50.0% |
50.9% |
47.0% |
50.0% |
48.6% |
2.3% |
|
|
13531 |
6224 |
7307 |
3237 |
3653 |
6890 |
2925 |
3653 |
6579 |
311 |
|
4 hr
30 min |
531 |
|
|
187 |
494 |
681 |
115 |
-137 |
-23 |
|
|
Florida CNN exit poll data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion |
Bush |
Kerry |
|
|||||
|
Time |
Respondents |
Male% |
Female% |
Male% |
Female% |
Total |
Male% |
Female% |
Total |
Margin |
|
|
|
46.0% |
54.0% |
52.0% |
48.0% |
49.8% |
47.0% |
52.0% |
49.7% |
0.1% |
|
|
2846 |
1309 |
1537 |
681 |
738 |
1418 |
615 |
799 |
1414 |
4 |
|
|
|
46.0% |
54.0% |
53.0% |
50.0% |
51.4% |
46.0% |
49.0% |
47.6% |
3.8% |
|
|
2862 |
1317 |
1545 |
698 |
773 |
1470 |
606 |
757 |
1363 |
108 |
|
3 hr
21 min |
16 |
|
|
17 |
35 |
52 |
-10 |
-42 |
-52 |
|
The MIT/CalTech charts and the table below appear to agree only in the discrepancy in NY. Their charts show
exit polls agreeing with vote tallies in most states except NY. My data which I believe to be correct and taken
from late night exit polls before the final update show a consistent and strong swing from Kerry to Bush.
|
|
|
|
Actual Vote |
|
Early Exit Poll |
Actual Vote - Exit poll |
Total |
||||||
|
EV |
|
Kerry |
Bush |
Nader |
|
Kerry |
Bush |
Nader |
Kerry |
Bush |
Nader |
Swing |
|
|
|
9 |
|
37 |
63 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
34 |
62 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
44 |
55 |
1 |
|
45 |
55 |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
-1 |
|
|
6 |
|
45 |
54 |
1 |
|
45 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
55 |
|
54 |
45 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
46 |
53 |
1 |
|
49 |
50 |
0 |
-3 |
3 |
1 |
-6 |
|
|
7 |
|
54 |
44 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
53 |
46 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.C. |
3 |
|
90 |
9 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
47 |
52 |
1 |
|
51 |
49 |
0 |
-4 |
3 |
1 |
-7 |
|
|
15 |
|
41 |
59 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
55 |
44 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
29 |
69 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
55 |
44 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
39 |
60 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
49 |
50 |
1 |
|
50 |
46 |
0 |
-1 |
4 |
1 |
-5 |
|
|
6 |
|
36 |
63 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
40 |
60 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
42 |
57 |
0 |
|
42 |
57 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
|
53 |
45 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
56 |
43 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
62 |
37 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
51 |
48 |
1 |
|
52 |
46 |
1 |
-1 |
2 |
0 |
-3 |
|
|
10 |
|
52 |
47 |
1 |
|
52 |
48 |
2 |
0 |
-1 |
-1 |
1 |
|
|
6 |
|
40 |
60 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
46 |
54 |
0 |
|
47 |
52 |
1 |
-1 |
2 |
-1 |
-3 |
|
|
3 |
|
39 |
59 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
32 |
67 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
48 |
51 |
1 |
|
49 |
48 |
1 |
-1 |
3 |
0 |
-4 |
|
|
4 |
|
50 |
49 |
1 |
|
54 |
44 |
1 |
-4 |
5 |
0 |
-9 |
|
|
15 |
|
53 |
46 |
1 |
|
54 |
44 |
1 |
-1 |
2 |
0 |
-3 |
|
|
5 |
|
49 |
50 |
1 |
|
50 |
48 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
1 |
-3 |
|
|
31 |
|
58 |
40 |
2 |
|
62 |
36 |
2 |
-4 |
4 |
0 |
-8 |
|
|
15 |
|
43 |
57 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
36 |
63 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
49 |
51 |
0 |
|
51 |
49 |
0 |
-2 |
2 |
0 |
-4 |
|
|
7 |
|
34 |
66 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
53 |
47 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
51 |
49 |
0 |
|
53 |
46 |
0 |
-2 |
3 |
0 |
-5 |
|
|
4 |
|
60 |
39 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
41 |
58 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
38 |
61 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
43 |
57 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
38 |
61 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
26 |
72 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
59 |
39 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
46 |
54 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
53 |
46 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
43 |
56 |
1 |
|
45 |
54 |
1 |
-2 |
2 |
0 |
-4 |
|
|
10 |
|
50 |
49 |
1 |
|
51 |
48 |
1 |
-1 |
1 |
0 |
-2 |
|
|
3 |
|
29 |
69 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
46 |
54 |
1 |
|
50 |
49 |
1 |
-5 |
5 |
0 |
-10 |
By: David Dodge, BSMME
(Manufacturing and Management Engineering),